Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Student activist removed forcefully from ISHAR lecture

Concerns about how the situation was handled linger

News Writer and News Editor

Published: Thursday, September 15, 2011

Updated: Friday, September 16, 2011 02:09

Protest

Provided by Jonathan Beck


Controversy hit the dome last Friday, Sept. 9 when a student was removed from a Canisius College sponsored lecture by Public Safety officers.

Morgan Dunbar ‘12 was protesting speaker James Ha, Ph.D.'s lecture on primate research. The symposium, entitled "The Use of Primates in Biomedical Research: A Personal Perspective," was organized by Michael Noonan, Ph.D., who heads the Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation (ABEC) program at Canisius College. He is also the director of the Institute for the Study of Human-Animal Relations, more commonly known as ISHAR.

ISHAR was inaugurated by Jane Goodall, Ph.D., D.B.E., two years ago. The organization aims to invite a number guest speakers, the next of which will be Wayne Percelle, president of the Humane Society of the US.

The controversy Friday night surrounded the use of animals in research.

Dunbar said the she had issued a request that Noonan host a speaker with an opposing position to that of Ha to participate in the symposium. The request was not fulfilled.

"We were protesting outside Montante because Noonan refused to include all sides of a very controversial topic, primate researching, during his so-called symposium event."

The protest was organized by Animal Allies of Western New York, of which Dunbar is a founding member, and included individuals from throughout Western New York and Ontario.

Outside of Montante Cultural Center before the event, caged individuals dressed in ape suits were being poked and prodded by others in bloodied medical clothing. The street theater protest was accompanied by brochures handed out by participants.

"We would like to see all use of animals in bio-medical research phased out," said Noonan of the controversial topic and ISHAR's stance. He added, "I think Dr. Ha was courageous and generous in representing the bio-medical community to speak to us in public."

Ms. Dunbar is not so far removed from the ABEC program. After her graduation from Amherst High School, she attended Erie Community College, State University of New York, where she obtained an associates degree in social science. Following graduation, she moved to Swansea, South Wales, a part of Great Britain.

"I founded and operated the Swansea Small Animal Rescue," she explained. "Although I've always considered myself an animal lover, I first encountered animal advocacy while living in the U.K., where I became involved in campaigns against fox hunting and the illegal use of snares."

When she returned to the United States, Dunbar began pursuit of a bachelors degree in biology and an associates in veterinary technology at Medaille College. Upon learning that she would have to participate in animal labs, she began looking beyond Medaille.

"I became aware of the ABEC program, which, on paper, sounded like a dream come true," she said. But her excitement about the transfer was short-lived.

In one of her first courses with Noonan, Social Organization of Mammals, she found herself once again facing laboratory research. As part of the course, students were required to collect data on the behaviors of a captive rat community.

"I witnessed severed digits, infected appendages, cannibalism and blood smeared cage walls on a daily basis," Dunbar said. "I observed students becoming hardened and desensitized to the suffering of the animals as the project progressed."

At that point she dropped the ABEC program and began to pursue a degree in philosophy, with minors in ethics and justice.

According to Noonan, a symposium works as follows: an invited speaker presents their speech, followed by a moderated question and answer session. The moderator is charged with deciding whether a question is acceptable, and if so, the speaker offers his or her answer. But the questioner is limited in what they can say as they are not an invited speaker and can be prompted by the moderator to relieve the microphone and return to the back of the line.

In an e-mail addressed to the news editor, Dunbar commented on the proceedings that led to her removal from Montante.

She asked Ha a two part question about University of Washington's "Federal Animal Welfare Act violations for performing over 40 illegal and unapproved primate surgeries and the starvation of a stump tailed macaque found dead in the UW lab."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments

Morgan Jamie Dunbar
Sat Sep 17 2011 20:25
@ Anonymous posting Fri Sep 16 2011 16:13--

You state, "I disagree with are her actions towards the reporter from her school. If she felt she was not represented fairly, all she had to do was speak with the editor, or the reporter calmly, and it all would've been much more respectful."

I did write to both the News Editor and the Editor-in-Chief from the Griffin and presented my criticism of a very flawed piece of writing by Amanda Gabryszak. There were more than three different corrections made to Ms. Gabryzak's article as a result. At no time was I "disrespectful" in airing my very pertinent concerns. Ms. Gabryzak never interviewed me for the original article she published, but was sure to include various statements from Dr. Ha and a very skewed account of my violent apprehension by public safety at the behest of her professor and program director, Dr. Noonan. I'm sure it's not easy to be assigned the task of writing an unbiased news article when, in order to do so properly, you would need to ask Dr. Noonan some difficult questions. We all see how that worked out for me on September 9th. There was a clear evolution in journalism from the original article published on September 9th to the article above. I am pleased with this article, as both sides appear to have been presented fairly.

Anonymous
Sat Sep 17 2011 20:23
@ Anonymous posting Fri Sep 16 2011 16:13--

You state, "I disagree with are her actions towards the reporter from her school. If she felt she was not represented fairly, all she had to do was speak with the editor, or the reporter calmly, and it all would've been much more respectful."

I did write to both the News Editor and the Editor-in-Chief from the Griffin and presented my criticism of a very flawed piece of writing by Amanda Gabryszak. There were more than three different corrections made to Ms. Gabryzak's article as a result. At no time was I "disrespectful" in airing my very pertinent concerns. Ms. Gabryzak never interviewed me for the original article she published, but was sure to include various statements from Dr. Ha and a very skewed account of my violent apprehension by public safety at the behest of her professor and program director, Dr. Noonan. I'm sure it's not easy to be assigned the task of writing an unbiased news article when, in order to do so properly, you would need to ask Dr. Noonan some difficult questions. We all see how that worked out for me on September 9th. There was a clear evolution in journalism from the original article published on September 9th to the article above. I am pleased with this article, as both sides appear to have been presented fairly.

Anonymous
Fri Sep 16 2011 16:13
Dunbar has every right to her opinion and to have answers to her questions. And I do not think that her protest , or her message has gone unnoticed, or that it was even disagreed with by the student body. Also, her anger at the severity of being removed from the event, possibly too forcefully is fully warranted. She is very passionate about her cause, and thats a great thing! What I disagree with are her actions towards the reporter from her school. If she felt she was not represented fairly, all she had to do was speak with the editor, or the reporter calmly, and it all would've been much more respectful.Also, its a college newspaper, and people make mistakes. I think she would actually be surprised to learn that she, and the reporter, have quite a bit in common, especially when it comes to views on animal rights. I'm all for fighting for what you believe in! Just be careful not to take out the good guys along the way.
Morgan Dunbar
Fri Sep 16 2011 12:07
@Steve Brown-- Mr. Brown, I appreciate your acknowledgement of my First Amendment Rights. However you are mistaken if you believe a peaceful protest outside the Montante Cultural Center somehow negates my right to free speech inside the Montante Center during the Q&A session. This event was open to the public and I was personally encouraged by event host Dr. Michael Noonan to attend and participate in the Q&A session. He also wrote to me, stating "we will welcome all points of view." I did not attempt to present a "point of view," but instead asked a two part question about Federal Animal Welfare Act violations incurred by UW (the facility that employs Dr. James Ha). Dr. Noonan refused to allow Dr. Ha to answer the second portion of my two part question, wherein I asked about the starvation death of a 3.5 year old stump-tailed macaque. Dr. Ha appeared ready and willing to address the second part of my question, but Dr. Noonan kept interrupting him. I made no attempt to "dictate the terms of an event on campus," as you claim. I simply asked a question, that society (regardless of their stance on primate research) deserves an answer to.
Steve Brown, Class of 1983
Fri Sep 16 2011 10:45
Ms. Dunbar is entitled to her opinion. She has a right to demonstrate and express her views. She is even obligated by her convictions to act on them and share them. What Ms. Dunbar is not entitled to...is dictating the terms of an event on campus. By the mere fact that peaceful protest coincided with an event she objected to...on campus...amounts to 'equal time'.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 16 2011 08:48
"According to Noonan, a symposium works as follows: an invited speaker presents their speech, followed by a moderated question and answer session. The moderator is charged with deciding whether a question is acceptable, and if so, the speaker offers his or her answer. But the questioner is limited in what they can say as they are not an invited speaker and can be prompted by the moderator to relieve the microphone and return to the back of the line."

I am curious as to if this was his definition before or AFTER last Friday's events?







log out